Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Wise And Not-So-Wise Marketing Strategies

I had a couple of interesting conversations today involving marketing strategies. The first was with a woman who is about to sign up for my service. I'll be entering her into the Riverside County and Desert Area MLS systems (her property is in Palm Springs). This is going to give her exposure to agents and the public from the Desert to Riverside County, up through OC and LA to Sacramento (and 5 other counties), through Napa, Sonoma, Mendocino, Solano and Marin Counties, over and through 3 Bay Area Counties and down through the Silcon Valley to Monterey (5 more counties!) It will cost her a pittance. Probably under $300 (she's going through an affiliate I work with). Apparently there are about 8 properties similar to hers in her complex. She's decided to price hers second-to-the-lowest (the lowest is a bank repo). She's also going to offer a 4% commission. In other words, she's not messing around--she's ready to sell and willing to do what's necessary to get the job done. Her logic is perfect.

The second conversation was with a previous client. She and her husband cancelled their original listing with me, months ago, because they were leaving the State for awhile. At this point, they are back and have decided to go it alone. She said the MLS never did them any good (though it sounded like they had received at least one offer that they had rejected, now with some regret). She and her husband have decided to limit their advertising to small venues, local city throw aways--forget about the MLS, realtor.com, the Sacramento Bee. She read a book that said small publications are the best. And they are very good--if all you want to do is attract a local audience. But she lives in the Sacramento area and would like to attract a Bay Area buyer. When I mentioned that realtor.com would probably really help her out in that regard, she said her property was too expensive for that audience. I couldn't figure out what she meant. Bay Area buyers can't afford Sacramento? Or realtor.com only attracts low-end buyers. Either way, I think she's wrong and her strategy doesn't look promising.

Time to write that Marketing chapter in my-yet-to-be-actualized Real Estate book.

2 comments:

Grandpa Dwight said...

What a defeatist and unrewarding attitude [the Sacto gal]. A wise seller would have gone BOTH ways if she had really bought into the theory espoused in the book. Hopefully she has enough money, because if successful, the result of her folly will almost certainly be a serious reduction in her property's potential sale price.

Sean Rafferty said...

First seller - SMART

Second seller - ID-10T! (sorry)

FSBOs need all the exposure they can get. Penny Saver & such? Come on!

...Sean Rafferty, CMPS
www.CMPSguy.com